Francine Lalonde–"… I will not have enough time to list everything that has happened and that has been written regarding the right to die with dignity since the debate on BillC-384 began."
"It is a sign, if a sign were needed, that shows the need to decriminalize euthanasia and assisted suicide or physician-assisted dying under certain conditions."
" The Collège des médecins du Québec could then, freely and without fear, continue the admirable work it has begun on appropriate end-of-life care, including terminal sedation and euthanasia."
" the Criminal Code of Canada hinders a genuine debate on vital life questions…"
Jean-Pierre Béland–"…we all know that the problem lies with the current Criminal Code…. In practice, is the patient not thrust into an impasse because the law forces doctors and caregivers to live in the ambivalence of palliative care language, which preaches independent choice when, in reality, the patient has no choice because he is denied assisted suicide and euthanasia?"
"approximately 75% say that the option should exist to perform euthanasia in order to help people die under specific conditions…."
"More and more people no longer have any moral or ethical objection to the idea of allowing a doctor to administer terminal sedation under extraordinary circumstances. Euthanasia is starting to be viewed as an act of support, the final step in quality end of life care. However, from a strictly legal standpoint, the debate continues…."
" Due to improvements in health care, people now live longer and it is possible to delay death, sometimes significantly. However, the ability to live longer has a downside because an increasing number of people suffer from degenerative or incurable illnesses, such as Alzheimer’s or cancer, which decrease considerably their quality of life…."
" But we cannot, based on this irrational fear—a number of studies have shown that when legislation exists, there is no slippery slope—and based on the slippery slope refuse assisted suicide to people who are dying in pain. That makes no sense, and that is what we are faced with…."
This is her third Bill now, and she claims that so much has happened and been written since this Bill began.–So much time is being devoted every time she drafts another Bill, working with the Duty-to-Die top intellectuals to deceive Canadians into thinking that there has to be a LAW!
Somehow she thinks that everything written since her first two Bills got flushed down the toilet, is a sign which shows the need to decriminalize euthanasia/assisted-suicide (under certain conditions). "My bill has a specific objective. It deals only with people capable of making decisions for themselves who are living in conditions of suffering that cannot be alleviated." How self-righteous can this woman get?–Her Bill, now her third Bill is so special, and it’s just so much better than all the other people’s Bills in other countries and States. She seems to be telling legislators to think that it’s just her Bill which refers only to mentally competent people. So, like all the LIARS in the Duty-to-Die advertising department, she hopes to get enough suckers to vote de-criminalizing murder into LAW.
"Freely and without fear"???–I don’t think so, because there are too many doctors and nurses in Quebec and across Canada, whose personal conviction is to get rid of people who they think have lived long enough. There is nothing wrong with the Criminal-Code of Canada. I think that it would be good to have an investigation of every Medical College in Canada, and let’s see how many doctors are family related to Hitler’s officers. Argentina was not by any means the only safe haven for German Nazis after the war; how many came to Quebec?–Manitoba?
What occurred in the Samuel Golobochuk case in Winnipeg should be a permanent scar on any Medical College in this country, which tries to legalize Hitlerian tactics disguised as "end-of-life" care.
In Toronto, Ontario Barbara Farlow is being resisted by every authority in the health-care system and law-enforcement, concerning the obvious murder of her child at the Hospital for Sick Children. There is a total cover-up surrounding the death of her child, and everybody in the medical profession had better be scared to death, every time they attempt to cover their tracks of patients they have murdered–not assisted!
There never was and never will be a problem with real doctors and nurses, who take care of extremely difficult cases of patients who are in pain, are terminally ill with cancer, or in other extreme circumstances. Such patients need pain management, and if it had not been for the Duty-to-Die cult advertising their murders to pressure governments to legalize killing people, doctors would never have had to worry about treating their patients. Now, sincere doctors are learning to treat patients, and not have to fear lawsuits, like the white-coat militants need to.
Francine Lalonde seems to think she really has it made now, because the Quebec Medical College is demanding a LAW. Well, I think the only laws needed, are laws which require doctors and all hospital workers who work on the floors and in Operating-Rooms to behave. There are horror stories which people are unaware of, that there have been situations where nurses during surgery have suffered physical and psychological abuse by doctors.–And these guys think that they have a right to demand a killing law?
Francine Lalonde claims that Canada’s Criminal-Code "hinders a genuine debate on vital life questions".–Which means exactly what? First of all, she is a liar! What it hinders is legalized killers.–And that is not about "vital life questions"!
Jean-Pierre Beland obviously doesn’t appreciate palliative-care, and insists that patients are denied their choice of euthanasia/assisted-swuicide. The Quebecois are so brainwashed by the French euthanasia propaganda, that I think alot of them almost worship euthanasia/assisted-suicide with the same fervor they have for Separatism. They think it gives them a feeling of power.
"approximately 75% say that the option should exist to perform euthanasia in order to help people die under specific conditions…." These white-coat militants just will not back-off from demanding a LAW to KILL!–And Francine Lalonde has become the Priestess of Death! I wonder how many of the 75% know anything about what happened to Samuel Golobochuk, and to Barbara Farlow’s daughter? If they did, I’ll bet their numbers of supporters would drop.
"More and more people no longer have any moral or ethical objection to the idea of allowing a doctor to administer terminal sedation under extraordinary circumstances…." The reason they don’t is largely because they don’t know anything else. The Death Cult gurus don’t want people to know that there is no need for a KILL-BILL, because it has always been legal for patients to refuse treatment and food. The Death Cult gurus don’t want most Canadians, and especially the disadvantaged Quebecois to know that people die everyday peacefully, and with dignity!–Which illustrates clearly that there is no law needed.
"the ability to live longer has a downside because an increasing number of people suffer from degenerative or incurable illnesses, such as Alzheimer’s or cancer, which decrease considerably their quality of life…." Just give these people enough rope, and they hang themselves. The people they should have been most enthusiastic about, with new technology enabling them to live longer, just happen to be the people they target to be killed off. Just like the other countries, they play the game that it’s their choice to die.–Really now, just give us a LAW, and these poor suffering souls will want to die early.
Well, there’s a guy down the hall from me with Lou Gherics. He makes it very clear that these dictators of DEATH don’t have any right to create laws which infringe on what he wants. He wants them to get off their asses, and start turning out cures–not just treatments for neuro-muscular diseases, cancer, alzcheimers and other diseases. Few people are aware that there are overseas cures for certain diseases, which the FDA, CDC and the World Health Organization refuse to allow studies and patents.
"But we cannot, based on this irrational fear—a number of studies have shown that when legislation exists, there is no slippery slope—and based on the slippery slope refuse assisted suicide to people who are dying in pain. That makes no sense, and that is what we are faced with…." These intellectual thugs accuse euthanasia opponents of "this irrational fear", pertaining to the slippery slope of euthanasia. They babble-on that there is no slippery slope, and they are well-documented LIARS! As usual, they want us to feel guilty that their patients are being refused assisted-suicide, because it’s not legal. They are LIARS! They say that it makes no sense what they are faced with.–Yes it does!
These doctors of Death have had generations to attack the FDA, CDC and the WHO for all the volumes of information which exists, about the root causes of many of these diesases. If they really were concerned about all their suffering patients, the Global Drug companies wouldn’t be raking in the hundeds of billion$ they rake in annually to poison the food and beverages we consume with Aspertaime, excitotoxins and everything which slowly destroys brain cells and neuro-muscular activity. But they enjoy the cashflow and lifestyle from treating people when they become sick, and then want to kill them off when they are finished with making money off them.
I think their noses need to be rubbed in it what liars they are, and like their brothers in the Netherlands are just facinated with killing people off, to make room for new customers.
Down with KILL-BILLS! It’s time to demand cures to roll off the assembly-line. How about budget cuts to research organizations who don’t come up with cures?